The Future of the GOP

This election raises two big questions for the Republican Party – how to regroup in the short-term, and how to rebuild for 2016. The 112th Congress has been characterized by obstruction and an unusual amount of bad blood even by U.S. standards, a strategy predicated on the assumption that Barack Obama would be a one term President. This assumption was shattered as a coalition of youth, women and minority voters emphatically rejected Mitt Romney and the Republican platform.

The GOP has some soul-searching to do. In the short-term they must consider whether their obstructionist approach is likely to pay off. In the long-term they must address their demographic problem. The former is simply strategic – the latter is essential to their relevance as a political force.


Ever since Obamacare was passed the Republican line has been simple: wait until 2013. Without a majority in the Senate or a sympathetic President they had no way of making good on their promise to repeal this supposedly unpopular piece of legislation. The President would need to run on his record, and an obstructionist Congress would make sure that that record was disliked and patchy.

This is what happens when you base your assumptions on conjecture rather than data.

Did the people reject Republican obstructionism? It pains me to say it, but I doubt that it was significant in the minds of swing voters. Most people believe the President to be more powerful than he is, and the blame for failing to pass legislation is usually laid at his door. The more important question now is whether the Republicans in Congress will continue with this tactic. Expect to get some indication of their strategy from the upcoming talks on the fiscal cliff.

Shifting Demographics

The GOP has a demographic problem. Any long-term strategy must take into account the fact that they got hammered by both minorities and women. Harsh anti-immigration rhetoric and regressive attitudes on gender simply do not play well with essential voter groups. If the Republicans are to have a hope of recapturing the White House, they must confront this problem.

The Republican base is old and white. A growing proportion of the electorate is young and non-white. Women vote(!). The majority of women rejected the Republican platform. The current Republican base is shrinking, and will continue to shrink. Unless they go through the painful process of updating their message to reflect 21st Century America, the GOP will become a permanent minority.

Of course, it’s too simplistic to say that if only their immigration policies were less right wing then Hispanic voters would go Republican. Women aren’t single-issue voters any more than any other voter group. But the fact of the matter is that these policies drive away enough people to swing the electoral math in favor of the Democrats

The most important task confronting the Republican leadership will be difficult and painful: they must embrace more liberal social positions without alienating their base. Never before has the GOP had such a narrow and focused philosophy. The vast majority of Republican lawmakers have signed Grover Norquist’s tax pledge. The primary system punishes those who stray off-message. The party will be split between those elements that wish for it to become more conservative still and those who wish for it to become more electable (and despite what you might have heard on RedState, these positions are incompatible).

This is the bottom line: either Republicans modernize their message or they become increasingly irrelevant to modern America. There will be no swing towards social conservatism. Roe vs. Wade will not be overturned. The groups that decide elections will not vote for a party that represses them.


5 thoughts on “The Future of the GOP

  1. Unfortunately for the GOP they seem to be in the last few days doubling down on their positions further, as if they weren’t true enough to them. Then you have the far-right screaming voter fraud, which serves only to make 2 problems worse. First is disenfranchises GOP voters further making turnout the vote operations harder, because why vote if the Dems are just going to steal the election. Second it doesn’t allow them to see they need to change policy at all, because they would have won on their current policy without fraud. Again I am on the outside looking in on this one, but as a Libertarian I find that the lack of belief in statistical data by both the far left and far right is troubling for the future of this nation.

    • You are right – the Republicans legitimately lost, and the more of them that realize that the better. It may take another cycle, maybe a couple, before the base accepts that something’s got to change.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s